ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Resins versus CAD/CAM PMMA for Provisional Crowns: New Evidence under Simulated Clinical Conditions.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Provisional restorations play a fundamental role in fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation. While current evidence has identified CAD/CAM-fabricated materials as the preferred option due to their excellent mechanical properties, 3D-printed resins have shown significant improvements in their performance in recent years. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to re-evaluate the fracture resistance of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D-printed resin and CAD/CAM-milled PMMA, considering the influence of artificial aging. Material and Methods: An Results: After artificial aging, 3D-printed restorations showed significantly higher fracture resistance than CAD-CAM milled crowns ( Conclusions: 3D printing demonstrated superior mechanical stability after artificial aging, supporting its clinical viability as an efficient, predicTable, and favorable option for provisional restorations in oral rehabilitation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.