ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Prevalence of lower second molar impaction on panoramic radiographs of Peruvian individuals. A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To determine the prevalence and primary radiographic characteristics of impacted mandibular second molars in Peruvian individuals using panoramic radiographs.Material and methods: This cross-sectional study examined 1,000 digital panoramic radiographs of young adults aged 15 to 40 years in Lima, Peru, conducted from 2022 to 2024. These radiographs were evaluated individually for each side, for a total of 2000 sides evaluated. Two trained evaluators performed the measurements. The selected radiographs included complete lower dentition and demonstrated good contrast and clarity. We evaluated the presence of second molar impaction and the level of impaction (coronal, cervical, or radicular). The direction of impaction was also assessed and categorized as vertical, mesioangular, distoangular, horizontal, inverted, or transverse. Additionally, the relationship between the third molar and whether the impaction was unilateral (right or left) or bilateral were evaluated. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0, applying Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and logistic regression ( Results: The sample consisted of 514 females (mean age, 26.79 ± 10.12 years) and 486 males (mean age, 26.26 ± 9.76 years). The prevalence of impaction was found to be 6%. Among the impacted cases, females represented the majority (61.67%) compared to males (28.33%). The most frequently observed level of impaction was coronal (78.8%), followed by cervical (16.5%) and radicular (4.7%). The predominant angulation was mesioangular (71.8%), followed by distoangular (16.5%), vertical (7.1%), and horizontal (4.7%). Unilateral impaction was fairly distributed between the right side (28.3%) and left side (30%), while bilateral impaction was observed in 41.7% of cases. Conclusions: The prevalence of impacted second molars in our study was significant and has a considerable impact on orthodontic clinical practice. This issue was more common in females, with most cases occurring at the coronal level. The most frequent orientation of impaction was mesioangular, and unilateral cases were more common than bilateral ones.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.