Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255377›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025

Validation of the APACHE‑II scoring system in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID‑19 and admitted at a regional‑level hospital intensive care unit: A retrospective study.

Y-C Chang, J Invernizzi, T Mcizana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Y-C ChangDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
J InvernizziDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Harry Gwala Regional Hospital, KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
T McizanaDivision of Actuarial Sciences, School of Management Studies, Faculty of Commerce, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scoring system to predict mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been validated for use in the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in the South African context. Objectives: To provide data on the outcomes and clinical characteristics of ICU patients in a regional hospital diagnosed with COVID-19. The primary objective was to measure the validity of the APACHE-II scoring system in predicting mortality in these patients. Secondary objectives included the description of clinical characteristics, potential risk factors for mortality and length of ICU stay. Methods: This study was a single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted from 2020 to 2022. Data were obtained from electronic databases and patient records to determine diagnosis of COVID-19, demographics, comorbidities, history, clinical parameters and patient outcome. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the discriminative power of the APACHE-II score in predicting mortality. Results: A total of 96 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses had sufficient data to calculate the APACHE-II score. The observed in-hospital mortality was 57.3%, while the APACHE-II score predicted a mortality of 25%. An ROC analysis showed poor discrimination (area under the ROC curve 0.58). Patients who had increased odds of death were those with increased age: odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (confidence interval (CI) 1.00 - 1.02), and those who were peripartum: OR 4.35 (CI 1.06 - 29.30). Other factors were not significantly associated with mortality. The median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay was 5.00 (4.00 - 9.25) days. Conclusion: The APACHE-II scoring system is a poor discriminator between death and survival in this cohort of COVID-19 ICU patients. ICU patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were more likely to die despite a relatively low APACHE-II score. Information regarding clinical characteristics of these ICU patients and their outcomes provides some insight into the nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contribution of the study: While mortality prediction models such as the APACHE-II score are valuable in general ICU populations, their applicability to novel diseases may be limited, as evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the limitations of these generalized prognostic tools when applied to future emerging diseases.

Indexed as

APACHEAPACHE-IICOVID-19Critical caremortalitySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41255377
PMCPMC12622879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.