ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025
Validation of the APACHE‑II scoring system in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID‑19 and admitted at a regional‑level hospital intensive care unit: A retrospective study.
Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eravacycline in Critically Ill Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of mortality in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ICU Infections: a multivariable clinical and predictive modeling analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scoring system to predict mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been validated for use in the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in the South African context. Objectives: To provide data on the outcomes and clinical characteristics of ICU patients in a regional hospital diagnosed with COVID-19. The primary objective was to measure the validity of the APACHE-II scoring system in predicting mortality in these patients. Secondary objectives included the description of clinical characteristics, potential risk factors for mortality and length of ICU stay. Methods: This study was a single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted from 2020 to 2022. Data were obtained from electronic databases and patient records to determine diagnosis of COVID-19, demographics, comorbidities, history, clinical parameters and patient outcome. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the discriminative power of the APACHE-II score in predicting mortality. Results: A total of 96 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses had sufficient data to calculate the APACHE-II score. The observed in-hospital mortality was 57.3%, while the APACHE-II score predicted a mortality of 25%. An ROC analysis showed poor discrimination (area under the ROC curve 0.58). Patients who had increased odds of death were those with increased age: odds ratio (OR) 1.01 (confidence interval (CI) 1.00 - 1.02), and those who were peripartum: OR 4.35 (CI 1.06 - 29.30). Other factors were not significantly associated with mortality. The median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay was 5.00 (4.00 - 9.25) days. Conclusion: The APACHE-II scoring system is a poor discriminator between death and survival in this cohort of COVID-19 ICU patients. ICU patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were more likely to die despite a relatively low APACHE-II score. Information regarding clinical characteristics of these ICU patients and their outcomes provides some insight into the nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contribution of the study: While mortality prediction models such as the APACHE-II score are valuable in general ICU populations, their applicability to novel diseases may be limited, as evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the limitations of these generalized prognostic tools when applied to future emerging diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.