Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255374›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025

Early mobilisation practices in Windhoek intensive care units: A retrospective review of patient profiles and physiotherapy practice.

I du Plessis, S Francis, B Morrow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I du PlessisDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4634-8595
S FrancisDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3208-4076
B MorrowDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-918X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early mobilisation (EM) is safe and feasible with positive patient outcomes in various settings. However, data from Namibia in southern Africa are lacking, and the status of intensive care unit (ICU)-based mobilisation is unknown. Objectives: To describe the mobility practices and profiles of critically ill patients in ICUs in Windhoek, Namibia. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive record review was conducted in two private hospitals in Windhoek. Data were extracted using a self-designed electronic data abstraction form. The primary outcomes were the profile of ICU patients and documented mobility practices. Secondary outcomes included the timing and frequency of mobilisation, physiotherapy techniques used, and adverse events during physiotherapy. Patients with incomplete datasets or illegible records were excluded. Results: The review included charts of 870 adult patients admitted to the participating ICUs between January and December 2016. Patients were predominantly male (61.8%; n=538), with a mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 56 (14.9) years. Most admissions were planned (66.3%; n=577), mainly for coronary angiograms (20.6%; n=179), cardiac conditions (13.0%; n=113) and cardiac surgery (10.3%; n=90). The mean (SD) length of ICU stay was 3.41 (3.3) days, and the mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 0.7 (2.1) days. The overall ICU mortality rate was 5.2% (n=45). Of the 870 patients, 352 (40.5%) received physiotherapy, with 345 of these (98.0%) being mobilised. The median (interquartile range) length of ICU stay for mobilised patients was 3 (2 - 5) days, compared with 2 (2 - 3) days for non-mobilised patients (p<0.0001). Adverse events during physiotherapy were rare, occurring in only 5 patients (1.4%). Conclusion: EM is often implemented as part of physiotherapy practice in Windhoek ICUs; however, fewer than half of the patients in this study received physiotherapy, highlighting the need for improved implementation of EM protocols and screening for readiness to mobilise. Contribution of the study: This study provides insights into intensive care unit (ICU) patient profiles and physiotherapy mobility practices in Windhoek, Namibia, demonstrating that early mobilisation is feasible and can be integrated into routine care. It highlights areas for improvement, including increasing physiotherapy referrals and implementing mobilisation screening. These findings can inform the development of more comprehensive, evidence-based ICU care protocols.

Indexed as

critical illnessEarly mobilisationpatient outcomesphysiotherapy practice

Identifiers

PMID41255374
PMCPMC12622880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.