ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025
Early mobilisation practices in Windhoek intensive care units: A retrospective review of patient profiles and physiotherapy practice.
Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early mobilisation (EM) is safe and feasible with positive patient outcomes in various settings. However, data from Namibia in southern Africa are lacking, and the status of intensive care unit (ICU)-based mobilisation is unknown. Objectives: To describe the mobility practices and profiles of critically ill patients in ICUs in Windhoek, Namibia. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive record review was conducted in two private hospitals in Windhoek. Data were extracted using a self-designed electronic data abstraction form. The primary outcomes were the profile of ICU patients and documented mobility practices. Secondary outcomes included the timing and frequency of mobilisation, physiotherapy techniques used, and adverse events during physiotherapy. Patients with incomplete datasets or illegible records were excluded. Results: The review included charts of 870 adult patients admitted to the participating ICUs between January and December 2016. Patients were predominantly male (61.8%; n=538), with a mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 56 (14.9) years. Most admissions were planned (66.3%; n=577), mainly for coronary angiograms (20.6%; n=179), cardiac conditions (13.0%; n=113) and cardiac surgery (10.3%; n=90). The mean (SD) length of ICU stay was 3.41 (3.3) days, and the mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 0.7 (2.1) days. The overall ICU mortality rate was 5.2% (n=45). Of the 870 patients, 352 (40.5%) received physiotherapy, with 345 of these (98.0%) being mobilised. The median (interquartile range) length of ICU stay for mobilised patients was 3 (2 - 5) days, compared with 2 (2 - 3) days for non-mobilised patients (p<0.0001). Adverse events during physiotherapy were rare, occurring in only 5 patients (1.4%). Conclusion: EM is often implemented as part of physiotherapy practice in Windhoek ICUs; however, fewer than half of the patients in this study received physiotherapy, highlighting the need for improved implementation of EM protocols and screening for readiness to mobilise. Contribution of the study: This study provides insights into intensive care unit (ICU) patient profiles and physiotherapy mobility practices in Windhoek, Namibia, demonstrating that early mobilisation is feasible and can be integrated into routine care. It highlights areas for improvement, including increasing physiotherapy referrals and implementing mobilisation screening. These findings can inform the development of more comprehensive, evidence-based ICU care protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.