Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255164›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Development and Validation of the Professional Fit Scale in Nursing.

Tuba Çatak, Betül Sönmez

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuba ÇatakDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Gedik University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0834-4858
Betül SönmezDepartment of Nursing Management, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6091-4993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aims to develop the Professional Fit Scale in Nursing and to test psychometric analyses.

designThis is a scale development and validation study.

methodsThis study was conducted in three phases: (1) creation of the items, (2) preliminary assessment of the items, and (3) assessment of the psychometric properties of the scale. The scale was tested using construct validity and reliability analyses after the assessment of content and face validity in accordance with the scale development guidelines. The data were collected between May and September 2021 from nurses working in Istanbul (n = 720).

resultsThe final scale included 56 items and 9 subscales, explaining 68.06% of the total variance. CFA showed acceptable fit (χ

conclusionThe scale, which was developed, evaluates the professional fit of nurses in nine fields: professional responsibility, interpersonal relations and care, problem solving, coping with stress, professional skills, continuous development, working conditions, professional achievement and professional autonomy. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Assessing the professional fit of nurses can contribute to the effective management of the healthcare workforce, increase the quality of nursing services and patient safety, which in turn may increase patient and community satisfaction. IMPACT: The scale is the first tool to measure nurses' professional fit. The scale demonstrates strong reliability, validity and psychometric properties. The developed scale can be used in identifying job mismatches and implementing improvements, career planning and shaping human resources policies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients or members of the public were not included in the study.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeynurseprofessional fitreliabilityscale developmentvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41255164
PMCPMC12627925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.