ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Comparison of Human and Canine P-Glycoprotein Substrates at R, P, and H Binding Sites.
Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Human and Canine P-Glycoprotein Substrates at R, P, and H Binding Sites.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) greatly impacts substrate drug disposition, so much so that regulatory agencies recommend ascertaining the P-gp status of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) intended for human use. Arguably, the P-gp status of drugs intended for canine patients is equally, if not more, important. Our research objectives were to assess whether human P-gp substrate data can predict canine P-gp substrate status and to explore the three previously reported binding sites within the P-gp binding pocket, the H-, R-, and P-sites. Competitive efflux assays employing cell lines expressing canine or human P-gp were used to compare the degree of overlap or independence of the three binding sites in canine versus human P-gp using site-specific fluorescent P-gp substrates rhodamine 123, calcein AM and Hoechst 33342. Because calcein AM can also be transported by multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1), experiments were performed to assess its potential influence on calcein AM efflux studies. Results indicate that: (i) MRP1 is either a non-factor or negligible factor for cells expressing canine or human P-gp respectively; (ii) determining an API's P-gp binding site may provide clinically relevant information; and (iii) use of human P-gp substrate data as a proxy for canine P-gp substrate data will often prove inaccurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.