ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Exploratory Pain Profiling With Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) in Episodic and Chronic Migraine.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the medication overuse headache cycle: from nociplastic pain mechanisms to patient-centered interventions - the Junior Editorial Board vision.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Interictal thermal pain hypersensitivity and central sensitization in migraine patients: a case-control study using quantitative sensory testing.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Exploratory Pain Profiling With Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) in Episodic and Chronic Migraine.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigraine pain profiling studies vary by sensory modalities, methods, anatomical sites and characteristics. This exploratory study aimed to identify pain profiling parameters using quantitative sensory testing (QST) for episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) and investigate potential differences, given conflicting results from previous EM versus CM comparisons.
methodsA total of 59 migraineurs, including 29 with EM and 30 with CM, were enrolled at Leiden Headache Center. QST was performed on the cheek and hand utilising various test stimuli. Normalised control values adjusted for sex, age, location were used to convert the measurement outcomes to Z-scores. Key outcomes included mean Z-scores and the prevalence of abnormal Z-scores (< -1.96 or > 1.96) in migraineurs. Z-scores > 1.96 indicate heightened sensation (lower threshold), while Z-scores < -1.96 indicate diminished sensation (higher threshold). EM and CM were compared.
resultsThe threshold for pressure pain (PPT) was lower in 39.0% (hand) and 32.8% (cheek) (all p < 0.001) in individuals with migraine. Cold detection threshold (CDT) was higher in 18.6% (hand) and 25.4% (cheek), while the warm detection threshold (WDT) was higher in 15.2% (hand) (all p < 0.001) in migraineurs. Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) was increased in 17.0% (hand) and the vibration detection threshold (VDT) was higher in 18.6% (cheek) (all p < 0.001). No differences, including for temporal summation (TS), were found between EM and CM.
conclusionsIn this exploratory analysis, no QST profile differences were found between EM and CM. One-third of migraineurs have increased pressure pain sensitivity in both trigeminal and distal regions, but decreased cold, warmth, vibration and mechanical detection, indicating complex sensory processing. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first exploratory study to compare episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients using a comprehensive battery of quantitative sensory tests (QST). The aim of this study was to explore various aspects of somatosensory function in individuals with EM and CM, with a particular focus on identifying differences between the two groups. Given that sensory thresholds may fluctuate at different stages of the disease, additional data are needed to clarify these distinctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.