ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Pediatric Clinical Development: An IQ Working Group Perspective on the Current Status and Challenges.
Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment and New Approach Methodologies: US FDA/Triangle CERSI Workshop Report.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Antidepressants: A Scoping Review of Existing Models, Applications, and Software Tools.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Strategies for pediatric dose derivation from population pharmacokinetic models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Advancing Pediatric Dose Scaling: Strategies, Modeling Approaches, and Clinical Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Polypharmacy and Drug Interaction Risk in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Heart Defects: Insights from a Nationwide Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Pediatric Clinical Development: An IQ Working Group Perspective on the Current Status and Challenges.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric extrapolation strategies issued by health authorities have streamlined pediatric drug development and reduced the unnecessary burden of conducting pediatric clinical studies. In line with these strategies, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been utilized extensively for initial dosing regimen and sampling timepoint selection for pediatric studies, as well as dose validation throughout pediatric drug development. Here, the status and challenges of PBPK modeling in pediatric drug development have been summarized by the IQ Pediatric PBPK Working Group. Our work reviews current practices for pediatric PBPK modeling across various therapeutic areas. To enable best practice, we propose an optimized workflow for pediatric PBPK modeling recommendations. Two selected key pediatric PBPK case examples are also described, where modeling impacted the drug label extension to pediatric patients. Moreover, we analyze the current gaps and challenges in our understanding of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination in pediatric PBPK model development. Since neonates are the least studied and the most medically fragile, the depth of our understanding of their rapidly evolving physiological processes is limited and so there exist significant modeling gaps which we summarize here. Finally, we provide recommendations, including building a public data repository, leveraging real-world data, and implementing microdose studies for addressing pediatric PBPK modeling challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.