ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2025
A Network Analysis of ADHD and ASD Symptoms in Chinese Children: Insights on Age and Gender Differences.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling Chinese children with symptoms of SpLD, ADHD, or ASD: a transdiagnostic and biopsychosocial study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Network Analysis of ADHD and ASD Symptoms in Chinese Children: Insights on Age and Gender Differences.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the transdiagnostic interactions between ADHD and ASD symptoms in Chinese children, identifying core and bridging symptoms, and examining differences in symptom networks across gender and age subgroups.
methodUsing data from a nationwide mental health survey of 71,217 Chinese children (mean age = 11.49, SD = 2.82), a symptom network analysis was conducted. ADHD and ASD symptoms were assessed via the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), with ASD items selected from an empirically derived CBCL autism scale. Network estimation was performed using the Glasso algorithm, and community detection was achieved through exploratory graph analysis (EGA). Network comparison tests (NCT) were used to evaluate differences in network structure and connectivity between gender (male vs. female) and age (younger vs. older) subgroups.
resultsInattentive symptoms (I8 "Cannot concentrate," I78 "Inattentive/easily distracted") emerged as central bridging nodes linking ADHD and ASD symptoms. Three stable communities were identified: (1) an inattentive/internalizing cluster reflecting overlapping ADHD-inattentive and ASD features, (2) a hyperactive/impulsive and immature behavior cluster, and (3) a social withdrawal/low energy cluster representing core ASD features. Females exhibited significantly higher network connectivity than males (global strength: S = 1.05, p = 0.03), with tighter symptom interplay. Older children showed greater ADHD-ASD symptom overlap, though global strength differences were non-significant (S = 0.70, p = 0.13).
conclusionTwo inattentive symptoms (I8 and I78) emerged as among the most strongly connected items in the combined ADHD-ASD symptom profile, suggesting that attentional difficulties could play an important role in the psychopathological mechanisms underlying both conditions. Nevertheless, this cross-sectional finding does not establish causality; longitudinal and intervention studies remain necessary. Screening approaches tailored to gender differences and local cultural context could improve identification of these symptoms in Chinese children and adolescents. The present findings may also guide future refinements in school mental-health support and related policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.