ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Machine learning-based management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: analysis of differences in key risk factors between gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia and construction of a pre-eclampsia prediction model.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIt remains debated whether gestational hypertension (GH) and pre-eclampsia (PE) are distinct entities or different spectra of the same disease. Currently, comparative studies of risk factors for GH and PE in the same population are limited. This study aims to identify the key differential risk factors between GH and PE, and develop a machine learning (ML)-based PE prediction model to address the clinical needs of low-resource settings.
methodsA single-center retrospective analysis included 1,157 pregnant women who established prenatal care records and delivered at Hangzhou Women's Hospital between 2019 and 2022. Five ML models-adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and gradient boosting (GB)-were developed and compared. The optimal prediction model and important features were identified, and the data set was divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%) for internal validation. In addition, external data were used to further validate the predictive performance of the model, with simultaneous performance comparison against the LR model.
resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated optimal performance (training AUC: 0.930; validation AUC: 0.763; testing AUC: 0.843). Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), age, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), triglycerides (TG), D-dimer, albumin (ALB), and uric acid (UA) were the important features, among which TSH had the strongest influence on the predictive model. Mean SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value provided model interpretability.
conclusionsThe XGBoost-based model effectively predicts the risk of PE occurrence, showing acceptable performance and interpretability, with its overall performance being superior to that of the traditional LR method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.