ArticleBioData mining2025
Computational prediction of cellular elastic modulus from mechanosensitive gene expression at multiple biological levels.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding cellular mechanical properties is crucial for investigating cell fate determination, embryonic development, and disease progression. Traditional methods of measuring cellular mechanical properties, such as atomic force microscopy, are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and low-throughput. Computational models which can capture the relationship between mechanosensitive gene expression, a readily accessible and cost-effective data source, and cellular mechanical properties offer promising alternatives.
resultsIn this study, we identified mechanosensitive genes from 104 cell lines, using RNA-seq data and corresponding elastic modulus from the MechanoBase database. Several statistical learning models were tested and gradient boosting regression emerged as the most effective, outperforming other models in accuracy. We termed this model MechanoGEPred. The model demonstrated its ability to predict elastic modulus variations across tissue samples, single cells, and tissue spatial domains, capturing complex relationships between gene expression and mechanical properties.
conclusionsBy enabling predictions at multiple biological levels, MechanoGEPred offers a useful framework for inferring cellular elastic modulus directly from gene expression data. The model reveals biologically meaningful patterns and context-dependent differences, suggesting potential applications in biomechanics and cancer research, and providing a proof of concept for studying mechanical heterogeneity and its role in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.