ArticleBMC psychology2025
Decoding the cascading architecture of creative ideation: an ERP study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Creative ideation (CI) refers to the process of generating original ideas in response to open-ended problems, with idea generation and evaluation being two key cognitive processes involved in CI. However, the current theoretical debate concerns how these two processes support CI. One perspective posits a serial model where idea generation and evaluation occur sequentially, while another argues for a parallel model where these stages operate simultaneously. To clarify this debate, the present study recorded EEG data from 150 participants performing the alternative uses task (AUT) and applied temporal-generalization multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to examine whether the temporal evolution pattern of CI is stable or dynamic. Results showed that the temporal-generalization pattern fell between the diagonal and rectangular patterns, suggesting partial overlap between the cognitive processes underlying CI. These findings suggest that CI does not strictly conform to the predictions of a serial or parallel model but instead aligns more closely with the cascading model, wherein the initiation of a subsequent process occurs before the completion of the preceding one, resulting in a partial overlap between them. Moreover, univariate analysis showed that the cascading of CI mainly occurred during the late component (LC) and post-LC stages, representing the temporal unfolding of idea generation and subsequent evaluation. Together, the present study clarifies the theoretical debate between the serial and parallel models of CI, reveals the cascading architecture of CI, and advances the mechanistic understanding of creative cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.