ArticleImplementation science communications2025
Implementation of an evidence-based multidisciplinary post-operative lower extremity amputation protocol (LEAP): barriers, facilitators, and strategies.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople undergoing lower extremity amputations are often overlooked in healthcare. Limited clinician knowledge and skills challenge implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Multidisciplinary lower extremity amputation protocols (LEAP) piloted in community and regional settings have improved outcomes and reduced hospital length-of-stay-but remain untested in larger settings. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing a multidisciplinary evidence-based LEAP for postoperative rehabilitation in a large urban quaternary medical center.
methodsThe planning phase study used the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) to develop and administer an anonymous survey. A purposive sample of 238 multidisciplinary professionals from a large urban medical center responded. The TDF and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation for Behavior Change (COM-B) framework-with its 3 components aligned with 6 behavior sources in 8 domains with further construct-level detail-were used for data analysis. Analysis was descriptive with barriers rank-ordered, facilitators identified by theme analysis, and strategies derived from written comments.
resultsClinicians responded from medicine (17.3%), nursing (16.0%), prosthetics (5.8%), physical therapy (36.0%), occupational therapy (24.0%), and recreational therapy (0.9%). Primary barriers fell within the knowledge, skill, and belief-in-capability capability-domains; and the professional role and environmental context opportunity-domains. Four capability and opportunity component facilitators emerged with corresponding strategies: education via short multimedia resources, hands-on clinical training, clinical support via champion mentors, and interdisciplinary coordination via automated multidisciplinary order set.
conclusionsIdentifying barriers and facilitators led to provider- and organization-level strategies that address capability and opportunity TDF components. Capability strategies included didactic education and clinical training supported by mentors. An automated multidisciplinary order set referral system emerged as the principal opportunity strategy. The order set aimed to improve communication regarding professional roles, enhance clinical training opportunities, and coordinate interdisciplinary care in the teaching hospital context of rotating multidisciplinary clinicians of a large urban quaternary medical center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.