ArticlePlant methods2025
A practical guide to two-stage sporulation of Pyricularia oryzae: introducing a filter paper method and comparison with existing methods using strains from diverse grass hosts.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPyricularia oryzae is a major fungal pathogen responsible for significant yield losses in rice. In recent years, diverse pathotypes have emerged as threats to other economically important grasses, including ryegrass, oats, wheat and foxtail millet. Research on host-pathogen interactions involving this species requires reliable spore production for inoculation. However, as a hemibiotrophic pathogen, P. oryzae often sporulates poorly on artificial media and typically requires specialized two-stage protocols for consistent spore production. Although several such methods have been developed, all were optimized for rice-derived strains and have not been systematically evaluated across strains from other hosts. There is also a practical need for a simple setup that allows advance preparation and frozen storage of spore stocks. Therefore, we developed a new two-stage filter paper method and compared it with four published protocols across 23 strains from 13 grass hosts.
resultsComparative analysis showed strain specific differences in sporulation across methods, with no consistent link to phylogenetic lineage. The filter paper method reached an inoculum-competent concentration (defined here as [Formula: see text] spores/mL, suitable for routine spray inoculation) without any concentration step in 18 of 23 strains (78%), compared with TARI 16/23 (70%), IRRI 15/23 (65%), corn grain 14/23 (61%), and mycelial mat 3/23 (13%). Spores dried on filter paper were ready to use upon thawing and retained germination with no change in virulence after six months of storage at -40 [Formula: see text]C. Step by step protocols with illustrations are provided for all five methods, together with practical guidance for choosing a method based on laboratory conditions, available resources, and research objectives.
conclusionsThis study provides a comparative evaluation of two-stage sporulation methods for Pyricularia strains across diverse grass hosts. Among the five methods, the newly developed filter paper method shows the broadest applicability across strains while maintaining yields comparable to established protocols. It can be prepared for frozen storage and used directly after thawing, enabling advance preparation and bulk stocking of inoculum for virulence profiling, resistance breeding, and disease management. These findings are particularly relevant for laboratories in regions that are affected by, or at risk of, outbreaks caused by this pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.