ArticlePopulation health metrics2025
Life-course socioeconomic status and obesity: scoping review.
Article in Population health metrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obesity as a Potential Explanatory Factor in the Association Between Socioeconomic Position and Multidimensional Cardiometabolic Risk.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Educational Inequalities and Obesity: Association and Attenuation After Lifestyle Adjustment in a Cross-Sectional Working-Age Population.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of body mass index on dietary habits and health behaviors in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectifThe life-course approach is believed to enhance our understanding of the intricate links between life-course socioeconomic status and obesity. In this scoping review, we delve into the literature that examines the links between life-course socioeconomic status and obesity and aim to characterize the life-course approach that was used.
methodsOur search strategy was based on the PRISMA checklist and was performed using three databases: Medline (PubMed), GeoBase (Embase), and Web of Science. We focused on studies that identify life-course socioeconomic and built environment indicators and associate them with body weight status indicators.
resultsUsing stringent inclusion criteria, we identified 52 relevant studies. Our analysis identified three main methodological strategies for studying the influence of life-course socioeconomic status on obesity. The main methodological approaches identified that characterize life-course approach are: 1) sensitive periods, 2) social mobility, or 3) risk accumulation. We found that low socioeconomic status in childhood, adulthood, or late adulthood; a disadvantaged socioeconomic trajectory; and cumulative exposure to socioeconomic disadvantages throughout the life-course increased the risk of obesity. Notably, the association between life-course socioeconomic status and obesity was significantly stronger for women in 56% of the studies.
conclusionThe social inequalities in obesity observed today are the outcome of socioeconomic inequalities accumulated over the life course. 56% of studies show that the influence of life-course socioeconomic status on socioeconomic inequalities in obesity is even stronger in women. Policymakers should prioritize specific interventions aimed at reducing socioeconomic disparities in obesity, particularly among women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.