Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254668›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2025

Effect of maxillary impacted canine teeth on root resorption of adjacent teeth: a CBCT-based observational study.

Nurşat Türker, Esra Ateş Yıldırım, Duygu Göller Bulut, Gülbahar Ustaoğlu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nurşat TürkerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Türkiye. nursatturker93@outlook.com.
Esra Ateş YıldırımDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Türkiye.
Duygu Göller BulutDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Türkiye.
Gülbahar UstaoğluDepartment of Periodontology, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption and periodontal tissues of adjacent central, lateral, and premolar teeth across different age groups using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging.

methodsCBCT images of 203 impacted maxillary canines from patients of varying ages were retrospectively evaluated. Parameters included eruption stage, localization (right/left and palatal/buccal/central), dental follicle characteristics (shape and width), contact with adjacent teeth, periodontal contour integrity, and degree and location of root resorption. Statistical analyses assessed the relationships between these variables.

resultsA total of 203 impacted maxillary canines, including 123 on the right and 80 on the left side, were assessed. Impacted canines were most commonly affected with lateral teeth (57.6%). Root resorption occurred in 33.3% of these lateral teeth, with 14.5% showing severe resorption. Mild resorption was most frequently observed in central incisors and first premolars (16.7% and 12.5%, respectively). Root resorption was significantly more frequent when impacted maxillary canines were in contact with adjacent teeth (p = 0.005 for central incisors, p < 0.001 for lateral incisors, and p = 0.012 for premolars). No significant difference was found between genders in terms of root resorption (p > 0.05). Impacted canines were most commonly located in the palatal position (73.4%), but no statistically significant difference was found in root resorption rates between palatal, buccal, and central positions (p = 0.490). Canine follicle shape, width, and eruption stage did not significantly affect root resorption (p > 0.05).

conclusionPalatal position and contact of impacted maxillary canines with adjacent teeth increase root resorption frequency, especially affecting lateral incisors. CBCT provides accurate diagnostic information that supports clinical decision-making for impacted canine cases.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCuspidRoot ResorptionTooth, ImpactedAdolescentAdultBicuspidChildDental SacFemaleHumansIncisorMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAdjacent teethCone-Beam computed tomographyImpacted canineMaxillary canineRoot resorption

Identifiers

PMID41254668
PMCPMC12625403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.