ArticleTrials2025
Sociodemographic characteristics of patients throughout the recruitment process into a randomized, controlled behavioral trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecruiting participants into trials is important to ensure trial success. We report the results of a recruitment process using electronic health records (EHR) to identify potentially eligible patients with telephone follow-up to enroll participants into a randomized, controlled trial of a physical activity intervention.
methodsPatients aged 18 to 77 years with prediabetes or diabetes not using insulin and reporting low physical activity were potentially eligible. An EHR program code was created to assess eligibility. Patients received an email or mailed letter explaining the trial and information that they will be contacted in the coming weeks. Recruiters made up to 5 contact attempts. Patients were categorized as never reached, contacted by phone, consented, and randomized. Information was collected from the EHR to identify sociodemographic characteristics through the recruitment stages. Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to test for differences in categorical variables; Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for continuous variables. Analyses were completed using R version 4.3.0.
resultsRecruitment continued from July 2020 through September 2023 with a goal of 482 participants. A total of 11,152 patients received either an email (89.5%) or letter (10.5%) informing them of potential eligibility (pre-diabetes: 66%; female: 57%; Hispanic: 65%; Spanish-language preference: 25%; neighborhoods with a high deprivation index: 24%). Recruiters contacted 4033 patients by phone; those contacted were more likely to have prediabetes than diabetes (77%), to be female (61%), were less likely to be Hispanic (60%), or to have a Spanish-language preference (17%) compared to those not contacted by phone (all p < 0.001). Among those contacted by phone, patients who consented (N = 721) differed from those who did not: they were more likely to be pre-diabetic (87%), female (75%), and less likely to prefer Spanish language (10%) (all p < 0.001). Four hundred fifty-one were randomized; 23% lived in neighborhoods with a high deprivation index, which did not differ from those not randomized.
conclusionsFollowing a recruitment process of patients identified in the EHR, people with diabetes, males, Hispanics, and Spanish speakers were less likely to participate in a physical activity behavior trial for patients with diabetes or prediabetes, with no apparent differences in neighborhood deprivation.
trial registrationRandomized Trial of Exercise Promotion in Primary Care NCT0445168. Registered on June 24, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.