ArticleBMC public health2025
Identifying vulnerable groups of community-dwelling older adults with a strong willingness to receive volunteer services based on machine learning methods.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough volunteer services play an increasingly important role in addressing the aging crisis, there is still insufficient evidence on which community-based older adult groups should be prioritized for service provision. This study aims to identify the key characteristics of vulnerable community-dwelling older adults with strong willingness and high demand for volunteer services.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional descriptive design. A total of 852 community-dwelling older adults from four central cities in China were surveyed between March 25 and May 5, 2022, using a convenience sampling method. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and advanced machine learning techniques in Python.
resultsLogistic regression (AUC = 0.975) and random forest (AUC = 0.970) achieved the best performance in predicting willingness, with the most critical predictors being absence of cohabiting family care and caregiving support, living alone, poor health and depressive status, having basic medical insurance, and advanced age. For demand level, multiple linear regression (R² = 0.230) performed best, identifying depression status, poor health, willingness to help others, and absence of government care as significant predictors. Model comparisons demonstrated robust and consistent variable importance rankings across algorithms.
conclusionThis study provides a scientific basis for developing more targeted and efficient volunteer service strategies, enabling closer alignment with older adults’ needs and more effective allocation of resources, thereby minimizing public resource waste. Its implementation has significant theoretical and practical value for optimizing service distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.