ArticleBMC public health2025
Social support and its related factors among elderly people: a cross-sectional analysis within the PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS).
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe worldwide rise in life expectancy has resulted in an expanding elderly population, particularly in developing nations, amplifying the demand for social support to manage the challenges associated with aging. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate social support and its associated factors among older adults in the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort study (PGCS) population.
methodsThe present cross-sectional study was conducted on 389 participants of the PGCS population. The social support was measured using 10-item Duke Social Support Index (DSSI-10). Data analysis was performed in SPSS v16 with a significance level of < 0.05.
resultsThe mean age of the elderly people was 69.88 (SD = 2.62) and 51.4% were female. The mean total DSSI-10 score was 20.05 (SD = 4.61). Based on the multiple linear regression analysis, lower age (P = 0.001), residency in rural area (P = 0.002) and being in the third tertile of wealth score index (P = 0.011) was statistically associated with lower total DSSI-10 scores. The coefficient of determination (R
conclusionBased on the results, it can be concluded that younger elderly individuals, those living in rural areas, and those with lower socioeconomic status experience significantly lower levels of overall social support. These findings highlight the need for focused strategies and interventions to improve social support among these vulnerable subgroups to promote better health and well-being in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.