ArticleBMC health services research2025
Patient and family perceptions of rural primary care interprofessional memory clinics for diagnosis and management of dementia: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAging rural populations globally are leading to rising numbers of rural people living with dementia, who experience challenges in receiving a diagnosis and accessing formal supports. Guidelines recommend that primary care play a lead role in diagnosis and post-diagnostic care coordination, yet there are few rural-based examples. The purpose of this study was to better understand the experiences of rural patients and caregivers attending rural primary care-based memory clinics.
methodsThe parallel mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) design included a 10-item questionnaire (n = 27) and telephone interviews (n = 8) with patients and caregivers attending 6 rural primary care memory clinics in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada.
resultsThe majority of those who completed the questionnaire agreed that results of assessments were thoroughly explained, they felt free to discuss concerns, were told about treatments, that it was helpful having all the health-care professionals together, and they learned about available supports. Results were mixed regarding whether they needed more information about the condition and its course. Four themes were identified in interviews: benefits of local rural-based care, sense of being heard, value of team-based care, and feeling supported for the future.
conclusionsThe rural memory clinics, run by local health-care professionals, address barriers previously reported by rural patients and families including geographic distances to services, challenges obtaining a diagnosis, limited specialist access, and challenges accessing post-diagnosis information and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.