Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254603›Full record

ReviewBMC urology2025

Prostate cancer misdiagnosed as prostatic abscess: case report and literature review.

Yanan Wang, Junguang Wang

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanan WangNingbo Yinzhou No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315192, Zhejiang, China.
Junguang WangNingbo Yinzhou No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315192, Zhejiang, China. tsjunguang@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs one of the most common malignant tumors in men, prostate cancer (PCa) has garnered substantial research investment from the medical community. However, due to multiple challenges in diagnostic techniques and clinical practice, cases of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis still persist. CASE PRESENTATION: This article presents a case of a 36-year-old male renal transplant recipient (RTR) who was initially misdiagnosed with prostatic abscess (PA) due to perineal discomfort, but was later confirmed to have PCa through surgery.

conclusionThis case highlights the similarities in symptoms and imaging manifestations between PCa and PA, as well as the complexity involved in diagnosing PCa. Furthermore, the article particularly underscores the significance of being vigilant about the increased risk of PCa following kidney transplantation, employing clinical examination methods judiciously, and enhancing the ability to differentiate PCa.

Indexed as

AbscessDiagnostic ErrorsProstatic DiseasesProstatic NeoplasmsAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMaleCase reportDiagnosisMisdiagnosisProstate cancerProstatic abscess

Identifiers

PMID41254603
PMCPMC12625306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.