ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring delay to diagnosis of endometriosis, a healthcare professional perspective.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Endometriosis in the Workplaces: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Study (Italy, 2026).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug resistance in dysmenorrhea: a study of prevalence, predictors, and alternative pain management among Nigerian female students.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- The role ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelay to diagnosis of endometriosis is an increasing problem. As it stands, the mean delay to diagnosis time is nine years. There is limited research exploring the perceptions of healthcare professionals regarding the diagnosis and respective delay to diagnosis of endometriosis in the United Kingdom. This study aims to explore this further.
methodsThis study used an interpretive qualitative approach involving healthcare professional perspectives on reasons for delay to diagnosis of endometriosis. A series of focus group interviews with 15 healthcare professionals (General Practitioners (GP), gynaecologists and nurses) were conducted to explore their experiences of (the pathway to) diagnosing endometriosis. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree main themes were identified: (1) masking and unmasking the symptoms, (2) power of the witness in diagnosis and (3) experiences that hinder the threshold to diagnosis. The presence of the patient alone is not always enough to facilitate a diagnosis, and as such, the presence of another individual, quite often a male partner enables the threshold to referral and diagnosis to be crossed.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals in this study described how endometriosis is often masked or rendered invisible, and how the presence of another person—most often a male partner—can legitimise symptom severity and influence referral decisions. Healthcare professionals should consider reflecting on how another individual in a consultation influences their thinking process regarding the diagnostic journey of an individual with suspected endometriosis. They should also consider their own preconceptions of endometriosis as an illness to explore how best they can support individuals with suspected endometriosis. These practical suggestions can be used to reduce the delay to diagnosis of endometriosis and bring positive change to the diagnostic process of people living with endometriosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.