ReviewBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Bilateral pulmonary cavitary mucinous adenocarcinoma in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and nomograms for lung invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma with distant metastasis: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report an unusual case of pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMA) in a 67-year-old immunocompetent male who presented with atypical imaging features that initially resulted in misdiagnosis. Chest CT revealed bilateral diffuse patchy opacities and consolidation with multiple cavities and nodules, mimicking infectious diseases. After unsuccessful anti-infective treatment, CT-guided lung biopsy confirmed PMA. The presence of multiple cavitary changes represents a rare manifestation of PMA that differs significantly from its characteristic imaging appearance, posing substantial diagnostic challenges. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of clinical suspicion for PMA, even when imaging features are atypical, as such presentations can lead to delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.