ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Can we implement midwifery-led continuity of care in Ethiopia? Maternal health leaders and midwives perspective: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecognition of the importance of midwifery-led continuity of care (MLCC) in promoting positive maternal and neonatal outcomes is remarkably increasing. Despite its potential benefits, the implementation of this model may face challenges, and understanding health professionals' perspectives is crucial for successful integration into existing healthcare systems. Furthermore little is known about feasibility of implementation of MLCC model in Ethiopia. Therefor this qualitative study aims to explore the perspectives of maternal health leaders and midwives regarding the implementation of midwifery-led continuity of care. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A qualitative study was conducted in Guraghe zone health facilities, Central Ethiopia, from May 1st to 15th, 2022. Three focused group discussions among midwives and twenty in-depth interviews were conducted among either maternity ward head and/or chief executive directors/medical directors who were selected using a purposive sampling method. Data were first transcribed and then translated from local language to English. Thematic analysis was applied using open code software to identify recurring themes and patterns in the data, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the professionals' perspectives.
resultsThe findings reveal a spectrum of perspectives among maternal health leaders and midwives regarding MLCC. Positive themes include improved patient satisfaction, enhanced personalized care, and potential quality care. Conversely, challenges such as resistance to change, concerns about coordination, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration were identified. The result favors implementing this model and underscores the importance of addressing issues for successful integration.
conclusionMaternal health leaders and midwives acknowledge the potential benefits of MLCC model implementation besides recognizing the need for careful consideration of challenges in its implementation. During implementation by health facilities targeted training programs, inter-professional education, and strategic policy measures to facilitate a smooth transition are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.