ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Detection and tracking of a gauze sponge in minimally invasive surgery using a YOLO and R-CNN based model.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gauze sponges are the items most commonly retained from surgery. The additional time required to find the missing gauze sponge increases anesthetic risk and causes a delay for the next surgery. In minimally invasive surgery, a digital camera can record any object on the screen during surgical procedure. This study aimed to compare modern object detection methods and propose a gauze tracking model to detect and trace the location of gauze sponges in surgical videos. The model consisted of a detection module and a regulating module. The methods used in the detection module included the YOLO series and faster R-CNN with different backbones. The regulating module was designed to reduce false positive detections. The model detected gauze and converted an entire video into a timeline to illustrate segments when gauze appeared on the screen. The timeline was compared frame-by-frame with human annotations. Faster R-CNN, with ResNet101-FPN as the backbone, outperformed other methods. Adding a regulating module further increased the accuracy and F1-score to 0.94 and 0.862, respectively. The model was trained and tested using human surgical videos. The presence of gauze sponge identified by the model was consistent with human annotations. The results are promising for the possibility of real-time gauze tracking during surgery. The model is able to provide critical information to help surgeons locate missing gauze sponges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41254443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.