ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
The unmet needs of gay and bisexual men following prostate cancer treatment: an integrative literature review.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Comprehensive Prostate Cancer Assessment on Sexual Health for Men Who Have Sex With Men (COMPASS).JU open plus · 2026Article
- Sexual function outcomes following prostate cancer treatment in sexual and gender minority populations: a mixed-methods systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Urological care for sexual and gender minorities: a narrative review toward equitable care.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Integrating sexual health into care for patients with cancer and chronic illness.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Article
- Generative AI Chatbots as Digital Adjuncts for Sexual Health Information After Prostate Cancer in Men Who Have Sex With Men: Auto-Netnographic Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvidence has highlighted the unmet physical and psychological needs of men throughout all stages of prostate cancer (PCa); however, much of the focus has been on heterosexual men. Research shows that gay and bisexual men (GBM) have unique and unaddressed healthcare needs. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature by exploring the needs of GBM following their treatment for prostate cancer.
methodsAn integrative literature review sought qualitative and quantitative primary research from five databases (British Nursing Database, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science). A keyword search was employed, and each database was systematically searched. A thematic analysis was undertaken of relevant literature.
resultsThe evidence shows that GBM have unmet information, support, and sexual needs. GBM with PCa frequently reported a lack of tailored information about how treatment affected their sexual health. Many felt isolated as mainstream PCa support groups catered to heterosexual men. Some GBM felt unsupported by healthcare professionals (HCPs) who seemed to overlook their unique needs.
conclusionsGBM with PCa faces distinct challenges regarding sexual health, information access, social support, and interactions with HCPs. A more inclusive approach to healthcare practices, support services, and clinical care for GBM is required. Implications for cancer survivors HCPs should caution GBM about the potential sexual dysfunction post-treatment and avoid making heteronormative assumptions. Tailored information catered to GBM should be delivered, such as signposting to support groups specifically for GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41254405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.