Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254297›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Trends in female authorship of spine literature from 2002 to 2022.

Dominique Rinfret, Sarah Wegman, Haseeb E Goheer, Mina Botros, Gabriel Ramirez, Ram Haddas, Ashley Rogerson, Varun Puvanesarajah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Early postoperative recovery of gait efficiency after lumbar decompression: three-month quantitative biomarker assessment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Characterization of abnormal asymmetrical lifting mechanics in surgery-candidate patients with lumbar radiculopathy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominique Rinfret *University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, United States.
Sarah Wegman *University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, United States.
Haseeb E GoheerDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States. haseeb_goheer@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-0202
Mina BotrosDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
Gabriel RamirezDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
Ram HaddasDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
Ashley RogersonDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
Varun PuvanesarajahDepartment of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States. Varun_Puvanesarajah@URMC.Rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-6403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize the change in first and senior female authors from 2002 to 2022 in prominent spine journals and assess the role of female senior authorship on authorship.

methodsPubMed was queried to identify articles in journals predominantly focused on spine surgery. Articles published between January 2000 to December 2022 from the top fifteen spine journals were queried. Articles involving in vitro data, animal studies, or a primary language other than English were excluded (n = 39,117). Gender API was then used to determine the gender of the first and last author of each article along with its % certainty. Names with below 90% certainty were excluded (n = 4100). Mixed-effects logistic regression model, with journal-level random effects, was estimated to investigate the association between first and senior author genders adjusted.

resultsOverall, 15,415 pairs of names (n = 30,830) were gendered by Gender API with over 90% certainty. Of the 1,697 publications with female senior authors, 18.4% were female first authors. Comparatively, of the 13,718 publications with male senior authors, 10.4% were female first authors. Female first authorship and senior authorship rates both significantly increased between 2000 and 2022, by 6.33% and 3.26% respectively. The increase in the adjusted proportion of female first authors with a female senior author was 1.60% greater than the corresponding increase for female first authors with a male senior author.

conclusionsFirst and senior female authorship rates have increased significantly from 2000 to 2022 in prominent spine journals. Further research into the role of training background, level of training, and productivity would characterize possible barriers and opportunities toward gender equity in female spine surgery publication rates.

Indexed as

AuthorshipPeriodicals as TopicSpineBibliometricsFemaleHumansMaleAuthorshipBibliometricGenderLeadershipSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.