Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Genicular Artery Embolization Using Resorbable Gelatin Microspheres for Refractory Knee Pain: Technique, Safety and Clinical Outcome.
Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcome and Safety of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Genicular Artery Embolization for Chronic Knee Pain: Expert Consensus Recommendations on Indications, Technique and Clinical Care Using a Delphi Process.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- [Anatomy of the genicular arteries-What interventional radiologists should know].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Transarterial periarticular embolization as a treatment option for chronic joint pain].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Segmentation of blush size guides embolic endpoints in genicular artery embolization.European radiology · 2026Article
- Repeated Genicular Artery Embolization Using Permanent Microspheres for Severe Osteoarthritis and Postsurgical Pain.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Interventional Radiology Perspective on Pathophysiology, Imaging Biomarkers and Procedural Strategy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- We Saved the Best for Last….Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Invited Commentary: "Road to Genicular Artery Embolization: Importance of the Anastomotic Network".Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the safety, technique and clinical outcome of genicular artery embolization (GAE) using resorbable gelatin microspheres (RGM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) or persistent pain after total knee replacement (TKR). MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 45 patients with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 1-4, n = 35) or post-TKR pain (n = 10) were included. GAE was performed using 100-300 µm RGM. Embolic volume and treated vessels were documented. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Psychological comorbidities were screened using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Adverse events were recorded.
resultsAt 6 months, mean NRS improved by 35% and KOOS subscale pain by 55% (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between OA grades and post-TKR. A median of 3 (2-6) vessels were embolized with a mean total embolic volume of 6.5 mL (2.1-18.0 mL) per session. Patients with a HADS score ≥ 8 showed less improvements in the KOOS (up to 2.2 points less per HADS point increase; p < 0.05). Total embolic volume was significantly higher in advanced OA and post-TKR, averaging at 2.7 mL more per OA grade (p < 0.0001). No major complications were observed.
conclusionGAE using RGM in doses higher than 2 mL is safe and demonstrates short-term clinical efficacy across all OA grades and in post-TKR pain. Patients with severe OA and post-TKR pain received higher embolic volumes. A HADS score ≥ 8 is associated with reduced clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.