Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254238›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026

Genicular Artery Embolization Using Resorbable Gelatin Microspheres for Refractory Knee Pain: Technique, Safety and Clinical Outcome.

A Taheri Amin, A Hübner, E Kemmer, P Krüselmann, F Ziayee, L Wilms, B Fink, K Jannusch, N P Hoff, B Homey and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. We Saved the Best for Last….Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A Taheri AminDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
A HübnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. ann-joelle.huebner@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2402-4496
E KemmerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
P KrüselmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
F ZiayeeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
L WilmsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
B FinkDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
K JannuschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
N P HoffDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
B HomeyDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
P MinkoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf 9772841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety, technique and clinical outcome of genicular artery embolization (GAE) using resorbable gelatin microspheres (RGM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) or persistent pain after total knee replacement (TKR). MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this prospective observational study, 45 patients with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 1-4, n = 35) or post-TKR pain (n = 10) were included. GAE was performed using 100-300 µm RGM. Embolic volume and treated vessels were documented. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months. Psychological comorbidities were screened using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Adverse events were recorded.

resultsAt 6 months, mean NRS improved by 35% and KOOS subscale pain by 55% (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between OA grades and post-TKR. A median of 3 (2-6) vessels were embolized with a mean total embolic volume of 6.5 mL (2.1-18.0 mL) per session. Patients with a HADS score ≥ 8 showed less improvements in the KOOS (up to 2.2 points less per HADS point increase; p < 0.05). Total embolic volume was significantly higher in advanced OA and post-TKR, averaging at 2.7 mL more per OA grade (p < 0.0001). No major complications were observed. 

conclusionGAE using RGM in doses higher than 2 mL is safe and demonstrates short-term clinical efficacy across all OA grades and in post-TKR pain. Patients with severe OA and post-TKR pain received higher embolic volumes. A HADS score ≥ 8 is associated with reduced clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticGelatinOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMicrospheresMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGelatin

Identifiers

PMID41254238
PMCPMC12868021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.