ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2026
Guidelines for T cell nomenclature.
Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of blueberry consumption on regulatory lymphocyte phenotypes and NK cell functional activity in middle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Moving for optimal immunity: the effect of acute high-intensity interval training on phenotype, virus specificity and chemokine receptor expression in human CD8+ T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Characterization of persistent HPV-specific activated T cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Tumor-educated macrophages promote cytokine-driven lung colonization in triple-negative breast cancer.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Interferon regulatory factors orchestrate CD8International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- T cell immunomonitoring: a comparative analysis of traditional and novel methods to quantify and characterize human antigen-specific T cells.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Entering the Age of Specificity in T Cell Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Conserved Metastatic Cell States and Spatial Immune Microenvironment Remodeling Define Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals clonally expanded CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells in histidyl-tRNA synthetase-induced myositis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Beyond B cell helpers: diverse roles of peripheral helper T cells.International immunology · 2026Review
- The live attenuatedResearch square · 2026Article
- An Outer Membrane Vesicle-Based Vaccine Combined with alb-Flt3L Promotes Durable Antitumor Immunity in HPV-Associated Cancer.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Paradoxical Th1 activation and CTLA-4 regulation is beneficial during latent cryptococcosis.mBio · 2026Article
- An inherent T cell-activating mRNA delivery carrier for in vivo CAR T generation.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Circulating B cell and T cell activation states predict clinical outcomes in melanoma and reveal dynamic immune reinvigoration with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- The ageing immune system and its battle with viruses.The Journal of general virology · 2026Review
- The Role of the T Cell Receptor Sequence in Shaping T Cell Functional Fate.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- What's your name, immune cell?Nature methods · 2026Article
- The Osteoimmunologic Basis of Biologic and Bioengineered Therapies in Osteoarthritis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Immunogenicity of a Candidate Hepatitis C Vaccine Based on Non-Structural DNA-Protein Sequences and a Novel Complex Adjuvant.Vaccines · 2026Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
60 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in T cell biology have revealed heterogeneity among T cell populations that is not captured by existing general nomenclature. This issue has caused an ad hoc broadening of core T cell subset definitions and the invention of new subset designations that have not been uniformly delineated. To address this issue, in this Consensus Statement, we propose guidelines that serve three goals. First, they advocate that primary research reports define the experimental basis by which relevant subsets are designated in the methods section of each study. Second, they provide standardized definitions for existing subset designations in popular use, and common experimental criteria for defining each subset are noted. Last, they present an alternative 'modular nomenclature' paradigm. The newly proposed modular nomenclature eschews conceptualization of antigen-experienced T cells as belonging to a few idealized subsets, and the nomenclature instead simply indicates individual biological properties present in a T cell population with brief descriptors. Collectively, these guidelines intend to enhance transparency in the literature while facilitating clearer communication of findings and concepts to researchers, students and clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41254224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.