ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing automatic diagnosis of thyroid nodules from ultrasound scans leveraging deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RCAF for patient-level thyroid ultrasound malignancy prediction under leakage-free evaluation and calibration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Emotional burden of TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules: clinical and psychosocial correlation.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases: applications and challenges.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thyroid gland is prone to various diseases, including thyroid nodules. Ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool, but classification accuracy is often limited by radiologist expertise. Integrating Artificial Intelligence, particularly Deep Learning, offers the potential to enhance diagnostic reliability. This study investigates whether transfer-learning Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can reliably classify TNs using a publicly available, biopsy-verified ultrasound dataset of 483 images (197 benign, 286 malignant). Nine pre-trained CNNs (ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and Xception) were evaluated with transfer learning, data augmentation, class balancing, and tenfold cross-validation. ResNet50 achieved the best performance (accuracy 96.90%, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) 0.97, precision 96.93%, recall 96.90%, F1-score 96.90%), followed by ResNet101 (94.75% accuracy, AUC 0.95) and EfficientNetB0 (93.09% accuracy, AUC 0.94). Other models achieved accuracies between 87-90% with AUC values of 0.89-0.93. Augmentation and balancing strategies effectively reduced class bias and improved generalization across all models. These findings highlight the superiority of ResNet50 while underscoring the broader potential of CNN-based transfer learning as a reliable decision-support approach for thyroid nodule classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.