Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254202›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing automatic diagnosis of thyroid nodules from ultrasound scans leveraging deep learning models.

Aya Rashed, T Medhat, Ahmed Elgarayhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aya RashedApplied Mathematical Physics Research Group, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. aya.rashed1000@gmail.com.
T MedhatDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Ahmed ElgarayhiApplied Mathematical Physics Research Group, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thyroid gland is prone to various diseases, including thyroid nodules. Ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool, but classification accuracy is often limited by radiologist expertise. Integrating Artificial Intelligence, particularly Deep Learning, offers the potential to enhance diagnostic reliability. This study investigates whether transfer-learning Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can reliably classify TNs using a publicly available, biopsy-verified ultrasound dataset of 483 images (197 benign, 286 malignant). Nine pre-trained CNNs (ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and Xception) were evaluated with transfer learning, data augmentation, class balancing, and tenfold cross-validation. ResNet50 achieved the best performance (accuracy 96.90%, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) 0.97, precision 96.93%, recall 96.90%, F1-score 96.90%), followed by ResNet101 (94.75% accuracy, AUC 0.95) and EfficientNetB0 (93.09% accuracy, AUC 0.94). Other models achieved accuracies between 87-90% with AUC values of 0.89-0.93. Augmentation and balancing strategies effectively reduced class bias and improved generalization across all models. These findings highlight the superiority of ResNet50 while underscoring the broader potential of CNN-based transfer learning as a reliable decision-support approach for thyroid nodule classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningThyroid NoduleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveThyroid GlandUltrasonographyCNNsDeep learning classificationThyroid nodulesUltrasound scans

Identifiers

PMID41254202
PMCPMC12627679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.