ArticleScientific reports2025
A dual recurrent neural network model of human-like motion for artificial agents and its evaluation in a VR mirror game turing test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Action-oriented approaches to cognition which emphasize the constitutive role of sensorimotor patterns for perception are gaining importance for the study of cognitive processes in the human brain as well as for endowing artificial agents with cognitive capabilities. It is still debated whether motor-based action-effect contingencies can be extended to social contexts. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that social sensorimotor contingencies (socSMCs) substantially contribute to successful social interaction, and that endowing an artificial agent with socSMCs could make it an interaction partner evaluated like a human. We studied a variant of a Turing test in which human participants had to decide whether they interacted with an artificial agent or another human. To disguise the true nature of the partner, movements were mapped to standardized avatars who interacted in a virtual environment. Depending on individual traits of the participants and the duration of the interaction, in about 74% of instances participants correctly identified the interaction partner. Subjects were less likely to detect an artificial agent the more they focused on the joint task rather than on the partner. Our results suggest that the subjective experience of physical social interaction to a significant extent accrues from basic sensorimotor patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.