ArticleScientific reports2025
A privacy-preserving federated meta-learning framework for cross-project defect prediction in software systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Software defect prediction (SDP) is a critical task in software engineering, aiming to identify fault-prone modules before deployment. This paper introduces the Efficient Communication Federated Meta-Learning (ECFML) framework for cross-project defect prediction (CPDP). ECFML integrates Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) with a lightweight Mobile Vision Transformer (MobileViT)-inspired backbone adapted for tabular software metrics. Feature vectors are projected into token sequences and processed via 1D convolutions and transformer mixing, enabling effective representation learning with a compact footprint (∼142 k parameters, ∼0.54 MB). This design reduces both computation and communication overhead in federated environments. Experiments on the AEEEM benchmark (EQ, JDT, PDE) show that ECFML achieves competitive or superior performance compared to ResNet-18 and U-Net. On EQ, it yields the highest gains in F1-score and AUC; on PDE it consistently improves F1-score and G-Mean; and on JDT it achieves performance comparable to strong baselines, reflecting stable generalization across heterogeneous projects. Privacy is enforced via Laplace Differential Privacy with a fixed clipping bound specified a priori, ensuring pure ɛ-DP guarantees per round under conservative composition ([Formula: see text]). Robustness analysis further shows that the framework maintains stronger performance than baselines under additive Gaussian noise and FGSM perturbations, though degradation remains under stronger adversarial settings. Overall, ECFML strikes a balance between predictive accuracy, privacy preservation, and communication efficiency, making it a viable solution for federated, privacy-sensitive software repositories.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.