ArticleScientific reports2025
Unassailable citrus disease classification via multi-stage deep ensemble learning with vision transformers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gypsum-based idol immersion waste as a novel additive for improved heavy metal immobilization during in-vessel composting of organic waste.Biodegradation · 2026Article
- HFA-Net: Explainable Multi-Scale Deep Learning Framework for Illumination-Invariant Plant Disease Diagnosis in Precision Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI driven multi modal deep learning system for wheat disease detection, yield prediction, and crop health monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To reduce losses from agriculture as well as enhance food security, we propose a three-stage deep ensemble for early citrus disease diagnosis from actual-field images of oranges (n = 2,240) as well as lemons (n = 208). To prevent leakage, augmentation is strictly enforced following splitting (70:30 stratified) following curation, normalisation, resizing by 224 × 224. Our contribution comes from combining state-of-the-art deep features by adding explicit texture priors. Namely, we add Local Binary Patterns (LBP) as well as Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) descriptors for micro-textures of lesions (e.g., stippling, scab rims around them, chlorosis encircled by veins) as well as second statistics (e.g., contrast, homogeneity, entropy) that CNNs/ViTs tend to discount by virtue of their small size coupled with variable-field data. These hand-crafted signals are z-score normalised as well as PCA-compressed for overfit protection as well as removal of collinearity then combined by deep embeddings. InceptionV3 (90% lemon) as well as DenseNet121 (93% orange) are the best of the five pretraining CNNs (ResNet50, DenseNet121, VGG16, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB0) that we test at Stage-1. The best CNNs are enlisted with a Vision Transformer (ViT) at Stage-2 for capture of long-range contextual capture improving upon Stage-1 by 98% (lemon) as well as 97% (orange). t-SNE confirms class separation while Stage-3 employs a multiclass SVM over the combined description that achieves 99% (lemon) while holding at 97% (orange) at another curation. The pipeline outperforms single-backbone variants, minimises variance while remaining lightweight enough for deployment, thus showing that LBP + GLCM texture priors compressed by PCA but combined by CNN/ViT features substantially enhance robustness plus generalisation for in-orchard citrus disease testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.