ArticleScientific reports2025
Trend and drivers of forest biomass change in the Greater Bay Area of China from 2000 to 2022.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forests store a substantial amount of organic carbon in living biomass and contribute the most to the global terrestrial carbon sink among all vegetation types. Nonetheless, the spatiotemporal variations in and drivers of forest biomass dynamics remain uncertain, especially in regions with strong human disturbances. In this study, we investigated the trends and drivers of forest biomass change in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) from 2000 to 2022 by constructing a remote sensing-based forest biomass model using the forest inventory data in the GBA. Our results indicate the forest biomass model effectively captures (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.