Trial reportScientific reports2025
Feasibility and outcome of the fewer falls in multiple sclerosis intervention: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls are common among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and bring risk of both injury and reduced quality of life. The multifactorial background to risk of falls necessitates adapted and comprehensive interventions. The "Fewer Falls in MS" intervention is a manualized online self-management fall prevention programme designed for both ambulatory and non-ambulatory PwMS. We conducted a pilot trial to evaluate feasibility and outcome of the Fewer Falls in MS to determine whether to advance to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). In this two-armed parallel group study, 46 adult PwMS from across Sweden were randomized to the intervention (n = 23) or control (n = 23) group. The intervention included six 2-hour weekly online group sessions led by a trained group leader, followed by a booster session 8 weeks later. Both groups received a brochure on fall prevention. Falls were monitored weekly for 18 weeks via SMS. The evaluation demonstrates that participant recruitment and retention, data collection, intervention delivery, session adherence, and outcome measures were feasible. At the 18 weeks follow-up, results from the standardized questionnaires and falls data revealed no significant between-group differences. Furthermore, no adverse events were reported. Meeting all, but one, progression criteria justify proceeding to a full-scale RCT, with insights from this pilot trial being used to further refine the intervention and outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.