ArticleScientific reports2025
Understanding wetland park feature influence through cross-regional multimodal analysis and interpretable modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wetland parks serve both ecological conservation and social service functions, and the mechanisms through which their spatial characteristics influence public perception have attracted wide attention. Given the ecological and socio-economic differences between China and the United States and the availability of social media data, this study focuses on 147 wetland parks in both countries. It collects image-text reviews and ratings, builds a labeling system covering ecological environment, infrastructure, and user experience, and develops a unified feature framework based on multimodal data. The study extracts text, image, and fused features for predicting sentiment values and scores, and applies the SHAP method to explain feature contributions and their interactions. On this basis, high-contribution features identified by SHAP analysis are selected as optimization variables. A multi-objective optimization model is constructed with scores, sentiment values, and resource costs as objective functions. The NSGA-III algorithm is then applied to obtain Pareto-optimal solutions and explore balanced pathways for enhancing perception under limited resource input. The results show that text features better capture subjective perceptions, while image features reflect objective landscapes. Multimodal fusion outperforms single modalities in predictive performance, enhancing label coverage and model interpretability, with a clear advantage in compensating for the limitations of image features. Perceptions of Chinese wetland parks rely more on the combined influence of ecological and service features, while U.S. wetland parks exhibit a more balanced multi-feature synergy. Further comparison reveals significant differences between the two countries in feature contribution rankings, feature interaction effects, and perception patterns. This study proposes an analytical framework that integrates perception modeling and spatial optimization. It not only reveals the central role of ecological and service features in shaping sentiment values and scores but also verifies balanced pathways between perception improvement and resource control through multi-objective optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.