ArticleScientific reports2025
Recombinase polymerase amplification of forensic short tandem repeat loci.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell strategies for the interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures: isolation techniques, genotype data integration, and prospects for application.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Rapid Forensic DNA Profiling via Real-Time Recombinase Polymerase Amplification of InDel Markers.Biosensors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are highly polymorphic repetitive DNA sequences extensively used in forensic science for identification of individuals. STR genotyping is usually performed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) in centralized laboratories. However, there is an increasing need for a low cost, portable and rapid STR genotyping method. Multiple methods for miniaturization have been explored, all relying on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for generating amplicons. PCR requires precise thermal cycling, which complicates the design of the STR genotyping microfluidic device. Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) is an isothermal DNA amplification method that operates between 37 °C and 42 °C and completes within 40 min. This, along with the robustness of reagents and reduced stutter rate compared to PCR makes RPA a suitable candidate for implementation in an STR genotyping microfluidics device as well as a part of the established STR genotyping work flows. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluate RPA assay for amplification of forensically relevant STR loci. Thirteen core STR loci of the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) were amplified using RPA in both singleplex and multiplex formats. The amplicons were then analyzed using three different methods: CE, Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). A subset of 5 loci was used for CE analysis. CE, Illumina and ONT sequencing of singleplex RPA each resulted in complete and correct STR profiles across all samples for the standard input of 1 ng. Sensitivity assessment demonstrated that complete and correct genotypes were achieved with DNA inputs of 62 pg and above for all but locus D8S1179. Attempts at multiplex RPA amplification resulted in incomplete or incorrect STR profiles. This outcome highlights a challenge in adapting RPA for simultaneous amplification of multiple STR loci, which is a standard requirement in forensic DNA profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.