Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253957›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Triplet offline causal discovery based on optimal Markov blanket and its application.

Waqar Khan, Brekhna Brekhna, Jianqiong Huang, Yajun Xie, Muhammad Suhail Shaikh, Muhammad Sadiq Hassan Zada, Yifan Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waqar KhanSchool of Big Data, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, 350202, China. wangkang@fzfu.edu.cn.
Brekhna BrekhnaDepartment of Computer Science, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, 00384, Pakistan.
Jianqiong HuangSchool of Big Data, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, 350202, China.
Yajun XieKey Laboratory of Data Science and Intelligent Computing, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, 350202, China.
Muhammad Suhail ShaikhSchool of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hanshan Normal University, Guangdong, 521000, China.
Muhammad Sadiq Hassan ZadaCollege of Computing and Engineering, University of Derby, Derby, DE22 1GB, United Kingdom.
Yifan ZhengSchool of Big Data, Fuzhou University of International Studies and Trade, Fuzhou, 350202, China.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2024J08242Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2024J08242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Offline constraint-based causal feature selection (OC-CFS) algorithms are essential for identifying causal relationships from observational data. However, existing methods often suffer from limitations such as low prediction accuracy or high computational cost, particularly when sample sizes vary. To address these limitations, we propose Triplet, a novel framework that leverages the HITON-MB Parents and Children (PC) strategy to identify strongly relevant PC nodes while eliminating irrelevant and redundant features. It concurrently employs the BAMB strategy to detect relevant spouses and discard irrelevant ones, and applies the STMB non-Markov Blanket (non-MB) strategy to identify and exclude non-MB descendants. Through this integration, the proposed T-OCD[Formula: see text] overcomes these limitations, accurately identifying the true MB with high prediction accuracy and reduced runtime. To validate its effectiveness, we evaluated T-OCD[Formula: see text] on benchmark Bayesian networks (BNs) and real-world datasets. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that T-OCD[Formula: see text] achieves significant improvements in both prediction accuracy and computational efficiency compared to existing methods. On small sample sizes (n=500), T-OCD[Formula: see text] achieved the highest recall in 5 out of 7 datasets, with an average improvement of over 20% compared to rivals. On large sample sizes (n=5000), it excelled in precision, achieving the top score in 4 out of 7 datasets with an average precision of 94%. Computationally, T-OCD[Formula: see text] is highly efficient, operating as the second-fastest method overall. It ran over 55% faster than half of the benchmarks and a remarkable 35% faster than the average competitor on large datasets. The source code for this research is available at the following repository: https://github.com/vickykhan89/T-OCDmb.

Indexed as

Bayesian network (BN)High-dimensionalMarkov blanket (MB)Offline causal discovery

Identifiers

PMID41253957
PMCPMC12627638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.