ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable machine-learning-based predictions of blood lead levels and school drinking water contamination among children: a case study in Washington DC.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water quality degradation poses significant risks to human health, ecosystem, and community. Many cities continue to rely on outdated pipes and water distribution networks that are highly susceptible to leaks, corrosion, and lead contamination. The processes driving lead contamination are evolving with aging infrastructure and changing environment, and there remains a critical challenge for predicting the associated risk. The key objective of this study is to improve the understanding and prediction of blood lead levels and school drinking water contamination among children using explainable machine learning. Focusing on Washington, District of Columbia, where lead exposure remains a persistent concern, we develop and evaluate random forest, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting models using environmental, topographic, socioeconomic, and infrastructure features as predictive inputs. We then apply Shapley additive explanations to quantify the relative influence of each variable on model outcomes. Results demonstrate strong discriminative ability across all models, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.90 to 0.95. Ensemble-based approaches consistently outperform logistic regression, achieving higher accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores, along with narrower confidence intervals. Over 11% of the city lies into very high-risk zone, and 13% is classified as a high-risk zone. In particular, Wards 1, 4, and 6 are among the most impacted areas, exhibiting high concentrations of lead service lines and elevated predicted contamination risk. City-wide predictions are primarily driven by lead pipe density and social vulnerability, while school-level risks are more strongly influenced by water infrastructure characteristics, including device type and building age. These findings offer critical insights for guiding targeted interventions such as lead service line replacements, prioritization of high-risk schools, and resource allocation to vulnerable neighborhoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.