ArticleScientific reports2025
Nationwide evidence from China on the dose-response between environmental fitness support and physical activity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the relationship between Environmental Fitness Support (EFS) scores and physical activity (PA), analyzing the non-linear and dose-response relationships between fitness environment support and different intensities of PA, as well as the impact of various environmental dimensions on PA intensity. Using data from the 2020 China National Fitness Activity Status Survey, a multi-stage stratified random sampling method was employed to select 5,760 village (resident) committees from 31 provinces, yielding 58,844 valid samples. The survey collected demographic information and environmental support factors (EFS scores), and used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to measure PA intensity. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software, including multiple linear regression and Generalized Additive Models. The EFS scores are significantly associated with PA intensity. MVPA demonstrated a negative association at low EFS scores, turning positive near the threshold of 35.06 (95% CI: 32.50, 37.80) points. In the adjusted model, traffic safety was negatively associated with VPA (β = -0.13, p < 0.001), while fitness facility support and aesthetics were positively associated with VPA (β = 0.15, p < 0.001 and β = 0.05, p = 0.021). MPA was also positively influenced by fitness facility support and aesthetics (β = 0.42, p < 0.001 and β = 0.63, p < 0.001), with traffic safety positively associated with MPA (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), but accessibility showed a negative correlation with MPA (β = -0.07, p = 0.014). Environmental fitness support was associated with VPA significantly and moderately with MPA, while fitness facility aesthetics benefit both; however, traffic safety and infrastructure were negatively associated with VPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.