ArticleScientific reports2025
Transformer windings defects identification using frequency response analysis and advanced data visualization techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformers, as critical components of power networks, are subjected to various mechanical and electrical stresses under different loading conditions. Their windings may experience minor, recurring faults that are difficult to detect in the early stages before they become apparent. Therefore, early prediction and diagnosis of these faults are of utmost importance. In the power industry, Frequency Response Analysis (FRA) is widely used for transformer fault diagnosis. However, one of the main challenges of this method is the complex interpretation of its results. This paper addresses this challenge by presenting advanced data visualization techniques for interpreting FRA results and diagnosing transformer winding faults. To achieve this, three independent methods-Factor Analysis, Fuzzy Clustering Analysis, and Principal Component Analysis-are employed. Each method demonstrates outstanding performance due to its unique characteristics: Factor Analysis identifies complex faults by uncovering hidden factors; Fuzzy Clustering Analysis detects combined fault conditions by handling uncertainty; and Principal Component Analysis enhances interpretability by reducing data dimensionality. Based on these techniques, a two-stage identification model is developed. In the first stage, the distinction between healthy and faulty conditions is made, and in the second stage, fault classification under faulty conditions is performed. Experimental results show that the proposed techniques can effectively extract various frequency response features and identify faults with high accuracy. After implementing the proposed techniques on a transformer, the need for expertise in fault diagnosis and classification is significantly reduced. This approach helps engineers and operators interpret the results more simply and efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.