Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253921›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Chemometric-guided diversity study of black turmeric essential oils from Eastern India revealed industrially feasible quality chemotypes with promising bioactivities.

Jyotirmayee Lenka, Basudeba Kar, Suprava Sahoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jyotirmayee LenkaCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
Basudeba KarCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
Suprava SahooCentre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India. supi.sos2000@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Black Turmeric), a perennial herb, is known for its bluish-black rhizome and camphoraceous aroma. Although it is reported to have wide range of therapeutic activities, the chemotype selection from eco-regions of Eastern India is still scarce. The present study investigated the intraspecific diversity in essential oil (EO) yield and composition among 53 accessions and the bioactivity potential of the top 20 high oil-yielding accessions. Hydrodistillation of the rhizomes revealed significant variation in EO yield (0.31-2.53% v/w), with the highest yield observed in Curcuma caesia 43 accession. GC-MS analysis identified 60 compounds, accounting for 85.09-99.94% of the total oil composition. The identified predominant compounds were curzerenone (20.31-28.12%), camphor (8.33-19.74%), eucalyptol (2.14-18.23%), ar-turmerone (0.26-17.83%), borneol (0.91-12.40%), curzerene (1.87-4.73%). Chemometric analyses, including PCA, PLS-DA, sPLS-DA, and clustering methods such as hierarchical clustering (dendrogram) and K-means partitional clustering, effectively classified accessions into three distinct chemotype: C. caesia curzerenone, C. caesia camphor, and C. caesia eucalyptol. The DPPH assay revealed remarkable antioxidant potential, particularly in Curcuma caesia 43 accession (IC

Indexed as

CurcumaOils, VolatileAntioxidantsChemometricsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant OilsRhizomeAntioxidantsOils, VolatilePlant OilsBlack turmericChemometric analysisChemotypeGCMSMorphological traitsNutritional analysis

Identifiers

PMID41253921
PMCPMC12627858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.