ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing machine learning models for predicting health service access and determinants among pregnant women in rural Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hierarchical machine learning models for predicting antenatal care utilisation among Nigerian women: Identifying actionable insights for health policy.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Predicting health facility deliveries using explainable machine learning in Sidama Region, Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant women in rural Ethiopia face substantial barriers to accessing adequate healthcare services, contributing to adverse maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Traditional statistical approaches often fall short in capturing the complex, nonlinear interactions among the diverse factors influencing healthcare access. In contrast, machine learning (ML) techniques offer robust tools for analysing large-scale datasets, identifying hidden patterns, and generating accurate predictive insights to inform healthcare interventions. This study aimed to determine the most effective machine-learning algorithm for predicting healthcare service access among pregnant women in rural Ethiopia. Data were sourced from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS). Seven supervised ML classifiers; Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, and Naive Bayes were applied to predict determinants of healthcare access. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to interpret the contribution of individual features. Gradient Boosting outperformed all other models based on its highest predictive AUC, achieving predictive accuracy (79.55%) and AUC (81.40%). Key protective (negative) factors associated with improved healthcare access included higher household wealth, residence in the Amhara region, media exposure, and alcohol avoidance. Conversely, lack of formal education emerged as a significant barrier, underscoring its critical role in limiting access to maternal health services. The superior performance of the Gradient Boosting model highlights its effectiveness in predicting healthcare access among pregnant women in rural Ethiopia. Socioeconomic status, regional residence, media exposure, and behavioural factors were linked to health service access, while lack of education remained a prominent barrier. These findings support the utility of machine learning in guiding data-driven policy and targeted interventions to enhance maternal health outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.