ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced YOLO-based framework for accurate detection and identification of common wheat impurities with distinct objects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized wheat seed classification using YOLO with morphological image feature enhancement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time detecting and identifying impurities in wheat grain mass is crucial for wheat storage silos, flour mills and modern combines. Depending on the detection objectives, accuracy is typically prioritized in laboratory-based applications, whereas real-time detection scenarios require a trade-off between accuracy and speed. Consequently, detection algorithms should be developed in alignment with the specific performance demands of each application. Given the strong object detection capabilities of YOLO models, four updated algorithms-YOLOv5n, YOLOv5x, YOLOv8n, and YOLOv8x-were employed to achieve the research objectives. In this study, a total of 700 labeled images of three different resolutions, encompassing 11 distinct classes, were used to train the algorithms. The results of this study demonstrated that increasing the model size had no significant effect on mAP but substantially reduced processing speed. For laboratory applications, YOLOv5x and YOLOv8x exhibited nearly identical performance, making them suitable candidates. Among the tested models and image sizes, YOLOv5n with an image resolution of 320 × 320 maintained accuracies while improving detection speed by 4%, making it a suitable choice for real-time applications. Overall, the mAP@50 for impurities with similar visual characteristics, such as wheat grains, sun pest-damaged grains, and shriveled grains, was 88%, 86%, and 85%, respectively, while for other impurities, it exceeded 95%. These findings underscore the potential of YOLO models for impurity detection in wheat, providing a non-destructive testing method that could be extended to impurity recognition in other grains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.