Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning glucose forecasting models for septic patients.

Xiang Cao, Dong Wang, Jue-Xia He, Jianguo Hou, Jun Li, Hua Jiang, Qi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiang CaoDepartment of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Dong WangSichuan Provincial Center for Emergency Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China.
Jue-Xia HeSichuan Provincial Center for Emergency Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China.
Jianguo HouDepartment of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Jun LiSchool of Mathematical Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Hua JiangSichuan Provincial Center for Emergency Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China. jianghua@uestc.edu.cn.
Qi WangDepartment of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. qwang@math.sc.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation DMS-2038080Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology No. 2021YFS0378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-induced glucose fluctuations present major challenges in critical care, underscoring the importance of accurate glucose monitoring and forecasting to improve patient outcomes. This study introduces a suite of forecasting models trained using continuous glucose monitoring data from a diabetic patient with sepsis (19,621 data points). The models include four transformer-based ones (iTransformer, Crossformer, PatchTST, FEDformer), a dynamic linear model (DLinear), and an ensemble zero-shot inference method leveraging ChatGPT-4. Model performance was evaluated for 15-, 30-, and 60-minute prediction horizons with an optimized 30-minute lookback window. PatchTST achieved the lowest mean maximum percentage error (MMPE) for short-term forecasts (3.0% at 15 minutes), while DLinear excelled at longer horizons (7.46% and 14.41% MMPE at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively). The ensemble ChatGPT-4 approach also showed competitive results. Overall, this work offers a toolbox of advanced forecasting models for ICU glucose prediction and management. The comprehensive comparison among the models highlights the promise of machine learning models-particularly DLinear and PatchTST-in supporting glucose monitoring and ultimately digital twin implementations, paving the way toward personalized and adaptive glycemic control in septic patients.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseMachine LearningSepsisDiabetes MellitusForecastingHumansIntensive Care UnitsBlood GlucoseForecastingGlucoseHypo/hyperglycemiaMachine learning modelsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41253896
PMCPMC12627512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.