ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainable electronic waste management framework for academic institutions in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technology is increasingly used in schools to teach, study, and organise. Technology use has increased e-waste. As "electronic waste" or "e-waste," old laptops, desktops, projectors, and other devices contain hazardous components that can harm the environment if discarded improperly. This study examines the challenges learning institutions face in handling e-waste without compromising efficiency, including the need to stay current, insufficient funds to repair equipment, and a lack of knowledge on how to dispose of it. To overcome these obstacles, this article proposed a shared solution: a sustainable collaboration to manage electronic waste. e-waste data collection and analysis are the foundation of this framework. Of 452 electrical products, 32.1% were older than 5 years and 34.1% needed repair or replacement. On-site recycling offers a 90% material recovery rate and a 10,000 yearly profit after operational expenses, making it superior than external recycling (210,000 vs. 7,000). Real-time monitoring, automated reporting, and decision-support tools make the suggested concept reproducible for sustainable e-waste management in learning institutions. The suggested framework would reduce carbon emissions by 5-7 metric tonnes and salvage 15 tonnes of valuable materials annually. It also estimates the cost of delivering electronic waste to merchants and compares it to the cost of constructing an e-waste recycling centre in a learning institution. By working together, educational institutions may lessen their environmental effect and be responsible technology guardians for future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.