ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable AI based cervical cancer prediction using FSAE feature engineering and H2O AutoML.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer, predominantly caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection, remains a significant global health burden for women, contributing to elevated morbidity and mortality rates. Early and accurate prediction is critical in improving patient outcomes and optimizing healthcare resource allocation. While machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods-such as support vector machines, random forests, and convolutional neural networks-have demonstrated promise in disease prediction, model interpretability, computational efficiency, and rely on large, labeled datasets. Additionally, conventional diagnostic methods like piezoresistive, piezoelectric, and optical lever techniques are often cost-prohibitive and complex, limiting widespread use. This study proposes a hybrid ML framework that integrates H2O AutoML with an autoencoder-based feature extraction and Fisher Score-based feature selection. To enhance model transparency and clinical trust, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) are employed. The workflow initiates with exploratory data analysis (EDA) and dimensionality reduction using a stacked autoencoder, followed by selection of the top predictive features via Fisher Score. The refined feature set is used to train multiple models via H2O AutoML, with the best-performing deep learning model selected. On the training dataset, the selected model achieved 95.24% accuracy, an AUC of 98.10, and a log loss of 0.1747. Cross-validation confirms the model's robustness with consistent AUC and log loss values. At the optimal F1 threshold of 0.517, the confusion matrix indicates an error rate of 5.75% for actual negatives and 2.59% for actual positives, leading to an overall error rate of 4.14%. LIME and SHAP are used to interpret predictions at the instance level, providing actionable insights for clinicians. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining AutoML with explainable AI and advanced feature engineering to enhance the predictive power and interpretability of cervical cancer risk models, offering a scalable solution for clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.