ArticleScientific reports2025
Identify MRI negative temporal lobe epilepsy with resting fMRI indicators and machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
About 30% of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) cases are negative on MRI, so quantitative diagnosis based on clinical symptoms becomes challenging. There is an urgent need for an accurate and reliable method to differentiate patients with MRI-negative TLE from healthy individuals. This study aimed to explore the use of machine learning methods to diagnose MRI-negative TLE patients based on single and combined resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) metrics. This study investigates the diagnostic implications of using both singular and composite resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) indices in patients with MRI-negative TLE. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the clinical data and rs-fMRI data of 90 patients with MRI-negative TLE and 90 healthy controls (HCs). Next, the participants were divided into a training set and a test set at 8:2. Functional indices extracted from each brain region included degree centrality (DC), voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC), regional homogeneity (ReHo), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF). A two-sample t-test was utilized to select significant voxels. After this, classification models based on individual rs-fMRI indices and combined rs-fMRI indices were constructed using ML algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), and logistic regression (LR) on the training set. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and accuracy, and validations were performed on the test set. Lastly, the feature contribution was assessed using Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) values. The SVM model employing a combination of rs-fMRI functional indices had optimal performance. On the test set, this model achieved an AUC of 0.89, with an accuracy rate of 82%, where the ALFF values from the cerebellum contributed most significantly to the model. In contrast, ML models based on individual rs-fMRI indices demonstrated inferior classification performance, whereas the RF model using the DC index had the lowest accuracy of 47% on the test set. The SVM model combining the fMRI indices has the greatest potential to distinguish between MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy patients and healthy individuals, suggesting a complementary role for the classification of resting-state fMRI indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.