ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2025
Construction of a mild cognitive impairment prediction model for Parkinson's disease patients on the basis of multimodal data.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Electrophysiological Signals for Machine Learning-Aided Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Multimodal data-driven eye-movement subtypes and their cerebral glucose metabolic patterns in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research aimed to establish a model predicting mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease patients (PDMCI) by integrating multimodal indicators. We prospectively collected general demographic data, clinical scales, gait parameters, eye tracking parameters, and neuroimaging parameters from 50 PDMCI patients, 50 Parkinson's disease patients with normal cognition (PDNCs), and 20 healthy controls (HCs). Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers and nested cross-validation were used to evaluate 31 feature combinations. Results demonstrated that the combination of clinical, gait, eye tracking, Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis along the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS), and Global Functional Connectivity Density (gFCD) features achieved an average accuracy of 0.9135 and an average area under the curve of 0.9602 on the test dataset. Notably, the combination of eye tracking and gait features also showed superior performance. These findings indicate that multimodal data integrated with machine learning (ML) can effectively distinguish between PDMCI and PDNC patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.