Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253843›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Projections of future agricultural management and crop choice under shared socioeconomic pathways.

Sitong Wang, Xiuming Zhang, Ouping Deng, Baojing Gu

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sitong WangState Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Xiuming ZhangInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1961-3339
Ouping DengState Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Baojing GuState Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. bjgu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3986-3519

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42261144001National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42325707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Future agricultural landscapes will likely be shaped by the interplay between socioeconomic developments and natural conditions. However, existing theory-driven, process-based models often rely on idealized assumptions, limiting their capacity to capture real-world complexities fully. To complement these methods through an observational, data-driven approach, we developed a novel global dataset utilizing a statistical fixed-effects model. This paper presents a novel global dataset detailing projections of harvested area allocation for ten major crop groups across 197 countries and regions from 2020 to 2100. The dataset was generated using a statistical fixed-effects model calibrated on historical data. It includes annual projections under six distinct SSP-RCP scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP4-3.4, SSP4-6.0, and SSP5-8.5). For each scenario, the dataset provides future trajectories for key national agricultural management inputs-including nitrogen application rates, irrigation extents, and mechanization levels-and the resulting projected cropping shares. This dataset is designed to support assessments of food security, trade policy, and environmental impacts by providing a consistent, data-driven set of future agricultural landscape patterns.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalHumansSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41253843
PMCPMC12627408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.